Several political parties are criticizing the government for not following stricter policies for travelers (DK) arriving in Denmark. They say that all people from countries with a high infection rate should present a recent negative test for the coronavirus or be tested on arrival. The current practice is inconsistent and insufficient, they maintain. Some arrivals from so-called “quarantine countries” with a “worthy purpose,” such as a job interview, must present a negative test. In other cases, people attending a funeral or a business meeting, for example, can enter freely. It is optional whether they submit to a test on arrival.

Are the testing facilities even being used?

Testing facilities were set up at Kastrup Airport in Copenhagen on June 15. Since then, some 25,000 people have entered Denmark there, but the number who have presented tests or have been tested is unknown. “We have said that Danes must comply with guidelines,” says Peter Skaarup of the Danish People’s Party. “And then we see, for example, a flight from Islamabad that brought a large number of infected people to Denmark.” Arrivals from high-risk countries should also be quarantined, added Skaarup.

Other parties agree that the current policy is not effective. Although testing is available at the airport, the facility is not prominent. All arrivals should be met by a test team that offers them a test, says Kirsten Normann Andersen, health care spokesperson for the Socialist People’s Party. They should be isolated until we know they aren’t infected, continues Normann Andersen, and that includes all travelers from other EU countries.

One test is not enough

But according to virologist Allan Randrup Thomsen, a negative test is no guarantee that one is free of infection. Tests may not be reliable in the country of origin, and one can become infected after testing negative. “To be certain, people should actually be tested twice at a few days’ interval,” says Randrup Thomsen. “And during that time they should be isolated, if this system is to function optimally.” Randrup Thomsen doesn’t think it is worthwhile to test travelers from all EU countries, however. If the infection rate is below the limit of 20 per 10,000, then the testing would involve much work and identify very few cases. The tests also produce some false positives.

Rasmus Horn Langhoff, health care spokesperson for the governing Social Democratic Party, agrees “with the intention to ensure that we protect Denmark from the coronavirus as well as possible. . . . I’m sure that we can do it better than we do today. And we very much want to look into this.”

Swedes sail to Denmark in vain

The confusion was no more evident than regarding the new regulations for arrivals from neighboring Sweden (DK). The country, which has followed a singularly laissez-faire policy regarding the coronavirus, has about the highest infection rate in the EU. It is one of the EU six countries that Danes are not allowed to travel to. There is an exception, however, for three regions in southern Sweden close to Denmark. Even residents of these quarantine regions are subject to certain requirements, however. If they do not have a valid purpose, such as work or family in Denmark, they must present a negative coronavirus test taken within the previous 72 hours. 

The Swedish media and a ferry company announced incorrectly that a negative test was not required, and the Danish police that manage border control at the ferry terminal in Helsingør had also received incorrect information at first. This led to chaos at the border as many Swedes on the ferry were turned away (DK) and had to sail back to Sweden. The ferry company, Sundbusserne, which had waited three months during the lockdown before opening the route, announced that it was canceling the route again.