This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Read more
The agonies of European multiculturalism
The agonies of European multiculturalism
Douglas Murray is a British journalist and associate editor at the Spectator. His latest book, The Strange Death of Europe: Immigration, Identity and Islam, which came out earlier this year, is of great importance for understanding developments in the past 50 years in Europe. It concerns the growing Muslim population in the region that poses an intractable social problem because it is not being integrated in European culture. A combination of mass migration, a falling birth rate among Europeans, and the acquiescence of Western European politicians has led to a situation in which traditional liberal Western values are being undermined.
The acts of jihadist terrorism that the book recounts are well known. The less sensational but disturbingly frequent incidences of rape and anti-Semitic attacks are also becoming familiar. The most shocking revelations of the book, however, concern the denial and guilt displayed by Western European politicians and the mainstream media, partly because they run counter to the skepticism about immigration that Western European populations have shown since the 1960s.
From guest workers to sharia law
At that time, when there was a labor shortage, Western European countries invited “guest workers” from Turkey and elsewhere to fill the shortfall. They were expected to return home when they were no longer needed, but they stayed. They were expected to become integrated, and when they did not, politicians denied that there was a problem because they were afraid of being called racist and would not admit that their policies had been mistaken. The police and the media supported this position by suppressing news of gang rapes and white slavery, for example.
Even though the large majority of the Muslim population does not commit acts of terrorism and violence, there is surprisingly widespread support among it for sharia law, the Islamic State, honor killings, female genital mutilation, and so on. The earlier predictions of problems that were treated as alarmist proved to be underestimated.
A religion of peace
And when news of atrocities did get out, politicians insisted that the acts had nothing to do with Islam, a religion of peace. They blamed their own culture for its colonial history and maintained that Europe had a unique responsibility to shelter even those opposed to its basic values. This is political correctness taken to masochistic lengths. At various times, for example, Swedish cabinet members and prominent figures have said that everyone is a migrant, that Swedes were jealous of the authenticity of Middle Eastern culture, and that a failure to accept migrants was equivalent to the Holocaust.
The book describes this syndrome in the UK, France, Germany, the Netherlands and Sweden, and it also describes a resistance to it in eastern Europe, notably Hungary. It makes little reference to Denmark besides the Mohammed cartoon crisis, but the implication of its message for Denmark is striking: with its infamous 50+ measures to restrict immigration, the current Danish government is actually taking the course that Murray recommends to mitigate the worst integration problems afflicting its neighboring countries.
Fake Syrians and children
Consider the issue of repatriating people whose applications for asylum have been rejected. In Germany, Sweden and elsewhere, there have been thousands of cases of people whose applications have been rejected for making false claims of being Syrians, of being minors or of being persecuted on political grounds. In very few cases, are they returned to their homeland or to the country where they should have sought asylum according to the Dublin III accord. The authorities lose track of them. Perhaps they survive economically on the black market or join criminal gangs. In any case, the official policies are considered impossible to enforce.
In Denmark, the number of such cases is relatively small, but they have been identified: In the first half of 2017, some 1,835 rejected applicants were repatriated. As of August 3, there were 941 waiting to be repatriated (DK), including 434 who could not be repatriated because of difficulties reaching agreements with their home countries. There is a debate between humanitarian organizations, which argue that those who cannot be sent home be given residence or work permits, and the administration, which argues that such measures would encourage others to enter the country on false pretenses.
Racist or realist?
Rejected asylum applicants have also escaped from Danish refugee centers and disappeared from view, but the concrete figures on the issue, the open debate on the policy and the negotiations conducted with the applicants’ home countries set Denmark apart from the usual practices and attitudes that Murray describes. The center-left Social Liberal party now also favors (DK) a reduction in the number of refugees, and the Social Democrats now propose (DK) following the Australian model in which applicants are processed outside the country. Because of a reduction in the number of applicants, Denmark using the allocated funding to support refugee camps (DK) in North Africa, as Murray and others recommend.
Denmark has been vilified for exemplifying xenophobic tendencies that have appeared in France, Germany and elsewhere, but if Murray’s portrayal is credible, its recent policies exemplify rather a more candid and realistic attitude toward the European cultural crisis than is found in most of the continent.